With the “new normality” upon us, ZIN70 Nixie Clocks can become ubiquitous in Hand crafted in own laboratory with edge technologies It is a merge of the classic Z and IN types of Nixie tubes Please meet the largest Nixie bulb in the world produced for Theseīeautiful glow discharge indication lamps can only be eclipsed by the larger The true resurgence of the Nixie devices commenced with the production ofĭigital Nixie clocks with mobile and web applications for grass roots. I've also tried removing -convert-links and adding -no-clobber to the wget command and running wget_command & wget_command (or as many & wget_commands as you want process instances) in the terminal to spawn multiple processes to parallelize the download, which would more closely simulate how the browser requests files, but no success.Stunning ZIN70 - the largest Nixie Clock ever If total_download_time represents the total time spent downloading the files, then this matches the speed of the browser, which would be ideal, however, wall_clock - total_download_time = 35s - 4.2s = 30.8s seems like a rather excessive time to write 248 files with cumulative size of 39M to disk. I would expect the time to run the wget command to be roughly the same amount of time as it takes the browser to request the files. Why is the wall clock time significantly longer than the download time and is there a way to make it faster? This website takes about 5 seconds to download and display all files on a hard refresh in the browser. The command above provides the following time stats: Total wall clock time: 35sĭownloaded: 248 files, 39M in 4.2s (9.36 MB/s) Wget -page-requisites -span-hosts -convert-links -adjust-extension -execute robots=off -user-agent Mozilla -random-wait
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |